Reconstructing complex regions of genomes using long-read sequencing technology

  1. Evan E. Eichler1,2,7
  1. 1Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
  2. 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
  3. 3Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Menlo Park, California 94025, USA;
  4. 4Department of Biology, University of Bari, Bari 70126, Italy;
  5. 5The Genome Institute at Washington University, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
  6. 6Department of Computer Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, 06800, Turkey

    Abstract

    Obtaining high-quality sequence continuity of complex regions of recent segmental duplication remains one of the major challenges of finishing genome assemblies. In the human and mouse genomes, this was achieved by targeting large-insert clones using costly and laborious capillary-based sequencing approaches. Sanger shotgun sequencing of clone inserts, however, has now been largely abandoned, leaving most of these regions unresolved in newer genome assemblies generated primarily by next-generation sequencing hybrid approaches. Here we show that it is possible to resolve regions that are complex in a genome-wide context but simple in isolation for a fraction of the time and cost of traditional methods using long-read single molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing and assembly technology from Pacific Biosciences (PacBio). We sequenced and assembled BAC clones corresponding to a 1.3-Mbp complex region of chromosome 17q21.31, demonstrating 99.994% identity to Sanger assemblies of the same clones. We targeted 44 differences using Illumina sequencing and find that PacBio and Sanger assemblies share a comparable number of validated variants, albeit with different sequence context biases. Finally, we targeted a poorly assembled 766-kbp duplicated region of the chimpanzee genome and resolved the structure and organization for a fraction of the cost and time of traditional finishing approaches. Our data suggest a straightforward path for upgrading genomes to a higher quality finished state.

    Footnotes

    • Received October 17, 2013.
    • Accepted January 9, 2014.

    This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.

    | Table of Contents

    Preprint Server